IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Freeborn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1838 0.4627 0.5072
2017-18 — AJHL 48 10 16 26 0.542 0.1817 0.1889 0.5013 0.5213
2018-19 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 58 20 33 53 0.914 0.3065 0.3038 0.8456 0.8383
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 26 15 16 31 1.192 0.3999 0.3999 1.1034 1.1034
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Adrian D1 NCHA FR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA — 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18181
Forward overall
#880
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Howie
Marian · 2013-14
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hall
New England College · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Fink
Concordia · 2011-12
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.