IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Howie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Hitmen NA3HL 45 9 7 16 0.356 0.0428 0.0464 0.1123 0.1218
2012-13 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 42 21 33 54 1.286 0.1549 0.1603 0.4062 0.4202
2013-14 Minot Minotauros NAHL 45 9 15 24 0.533 0.1980 0.1994 0.5647 0.5686
2014-15 Minot Minotauros NAHL 58 14 13 27 0.466 0.1728 0.1649 0.4929 0.4705
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA SR 28 8 8 16 0.571
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA JR 29 8 8 16 0.552
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA SO 27 8 16 24 0.889
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 10 8 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2015-16 · Marian
+295.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5310
Defenseman overall
#944
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dave Lewandowski
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Orn
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.