IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seiya Tanaka-Campbell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1862 0.1862 0.7286 0.7286
2021-22 Vernon Vipers BCHL 25 1 12 13 0.520 0.1937 0.1957 0.7577 0.7657
2022-23 Vernon Vipers BCHL 49 13 20 33 0.673 0.2509 0.2413 0.9814 0.9437
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC SR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC JR 20 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC SO 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24168
Forward overall
#1333
Forward born in 2003
#1415
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.