← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conner Elliott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Penticton Vees BCHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 19 1 6 7 0.368 0.1419 0.1419 0.5368 0.5368
2021-22 BCHL 48 3 12 15 0.312 0.1204 0.1210 0.4553 0.4576
2022-23 BCHL 52 4 13 17 0.327 0.1260 0.1205 0.4763 0.4554
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 52 7 16 23 0.442 0.1704 0.1551 0.6445 0.5867
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 30 3 11 14 0.467
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 18 2 8 10 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2024-25 · Hobart
+316.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11664
Defenseman overall
#2391
Defenseman born in 2003
#2178
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.