IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Bono Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 18 3 13 16 0.889 0.3425 0.3425 1.2936 1.2936
2021-22 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 53 16 18 34 0.641 0.2472 0.2612 0.9336 0.9865
2022-23 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 50 17 20 37 0.740 0.2851 0.2873 1.0769 1.0852
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC JR 35 4 6 10 0.286
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 33 5 4 9 0.273
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast — 29 6 3 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2023-24 · Merrimack
+30.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18407
Forward overall
#936
Forward born in 2004
#833
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Ciappa
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tom Bark
Lake Forest · 2008-09
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Canady
Post · 2022-23
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.