← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rhys Bentham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.1118 0.1118 0.4371 0.4371
2021-22 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 51 1 22 23 0.451 0.1680 0.1635 0.6572 0.6396
2022-23 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 48 13 25 38 0.792 0.2949 0.2725 1.1536 1.0661
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC JR 31 4 7 11 0.355
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC SR 8 1 3 4 0.500
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC JR 26 6 3 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Yale
+60.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5912
Defenseman overall
#1492
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2016-17
0.895 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.