IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Yee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Coquitlam Express BCHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0257 0.0257 0.0972 0.0972
2021-22 Lawrenceville School NE-Prep 29 8 8 16 0.552 0.1064 0.1064 0.2525 0.2525
2022-23 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 22 0 4 4 0.182 0.0610 0.0622 0.1685 0.1717
2023-24 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 47 3 12 15 0.319 0.1070 0.1040 0.2957 0.2873
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 28 1 4 5 0.179
2024-25 Williams D3 NESCAC — 24 2 6 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Williams
+304.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22198
Defenseman overall
#3712
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Novick
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conklin
Canton · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Sutliffe
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.