IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bailey Conklin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHLP 5 2 1 3 0.600 0.0688 0.0726 0.1352 0.1427
2017-18 — USPHL-Premier 34 11 15 26 0.765 0.1000 0.0981 0.2595 0.2547
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 21 2 0 2 0.095
2019-20 Canton D1 SUNYAC SO 19 1 3 4 0.210
2019-20 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 19 1 3 4 0.210
2018-19 Canton D1 SUNYAC FR 24 3 6 9 0.375
2018-19 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 24 3 6 9 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2018-19 · Canton
+398.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
85%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21189
Forward overall
#1023
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will O'Neill
Worcester State · 2007-08
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Roe
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stewart Sjoberg
Neumann · 2003-04
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.