← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Novick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 North York Rangers OJHL 7 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 North York Rangers OJHL 29 0 5 5 0.172 0.0482 0.0510 0.1190 0.1259
2014-15 North York Rangers OJHL 51 2 11 13 0.255 0.0712 0.0717 0.1759 0.1770
2015-16 OJHL 49 8 24 32 0.653 0.1825 0.1736 0.4507 0.4287
2016-17 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 54 14 30 44 0.815 0.2277 0.2064 0.5623 0.5097
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Oswego D3 JR 26 6 18 24 0.923
2018-19 SUNY Oswego D3 SO 28 7 14 21 0.750
2017-18 SUNY Oswego D3 FR 25 1 10 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2017-18 · SUNY Oswego
+141.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5243
Defenseman overall
#969
Defenseman born in 1996
#1874
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2012-13
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.