← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Dorrington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-13 Country: USA
2022 · Round 6, Pick #176  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 33 1 4 5 0.151 0.0300 0.0300 0.0690 0.0690
2019-20 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 34 7 10 17 0.500 0.0990 0.0990 0.2278 0.2278
2020-21 NCDC 33 2 18 20 0.606 0.2471 0.2471
2021-22 USHL 41 3 8 11 0.268 0.1583 0.1662 0.8058 0.8458
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 37 2 13 15 0.405
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 33 6 6 12 0.364
2022-23 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 35 0 6 6 0.171
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Northeastern
+30.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2005-06
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.