IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trent Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 51 8 13 21 0.412 0.1534 0.1655 0.6000 0.6473
2022-23 Surrey Eagles BCHL 32 6 6 12 0.375 0.1397 0.1439 0.5464 0.5626
2023-24 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 54 20 15 35 0.648 0.2414 0.2375 0.9443 0.9291
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 37 5 10 15 0.405
2024-25 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 35 5 13 18 0.514
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2024-25 · Robert Morris
+200.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29916
Forward overall
#1765
Forward born in 2004
#1855
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Depp
Elmira · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joona Juntunen
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dunner
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.