IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Provo Predators USPHL-Premier 18 16 10 26 1.444 0.4761 0.4761 0.4914 0.4914
2021-22 Oakville Blades OJHL 30 14 9 23 0.767 0.2303 0.2390 0.5248 0.5446
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 47 23 16 39 0.830 0.3091 0.3068 1.2091 1.2001
2023-24 — BCHL 37 10 15 25 0.676 0.2517 0.2383 0.9846 0.9321
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19900
Forward overall
#1029
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tio D'Addario
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Ehl
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Callanan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.