← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pat Lawn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Rivers School NE-Prep 30 0 2 2 0.067 0.0188 0.0188 0.0305 0.0305
2019-20 Rivers School NE-Prep 26 2 3 5 0.192 0.0542 0.0542 0.0880 0.0880
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 14 1 4 5 0.357 0.1991 0.1991 0.2888 0.2888
2021-22 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 37 4 10 14 0.378 0.1410 0.1292 0.5514 0.5053
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bentley D1 AHA SR 21 2 1 3 0.143
2024-25 Bentley D1 AHA JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Bentley D1 AHA SO 28 0 4 4 0.143
2022-23 Bentley D1 AHA FR 29 2 2 4 0.138
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2022-23 · Bentley
+47.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11720
Defenseman overall
#2132
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.