IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eli Barnett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-16 Country: Canada
2022 · Round 7, Pick #195  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
Signed Professionally
Univ. of New Brunswick · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — BCHL 53 3 10 13 0.245 0.0945 0.0983 0.3570 0.3713
2022-23 — BCHL 52 4 5 9 0.173 0.0667 0.0661 0.2519 0.2497
2025-26 Univ. of New Brunswick USports-M 28 0 8 8 0.286 0.1507 0.1568 0.8374 0.8714
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 24 0 5 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Vermont
+179.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15260
Defenseman overall
#2853
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2009-10
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.