IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vitaly Levyy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Langley Rivermen BCHL 51 2 5 7 0.137 0.0529 0.0541 0.1998 0.2043
2022-23 Langley Rivermen BCHL 54 25 23 48 0.889 0.3425 0.3334 1.2936 1.2591
2023-24 Langley Rivermen BCHL 53 22 30 52 0.981 0.3780 0.3506 1.4278 1.3243
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 39 8 8 16 0.410
2024-25 Sacred Heart D1 AHA — 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · Sacred Heart
-62.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17709
Forward overall
#888
Forward born in 2003
#764
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trent Flory
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Anderson
Norwich · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly Wosnack
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.