IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter McInnes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-30 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 7 0 4 4 0.571 0.2202 0.2469 0.8326 0.9335
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 30 3 3 6 0.200 0.0771 0.0827 0.2914 0.3124
2023-24 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 46 2 9 11 0.239 0.0921 0.0945 0.3484 0.3576
2024-25 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 13 1 3 4 0.308 0.1186 0.1158 0.4483 0.4376
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17402
Defenseman overall
#3172
Defenseman born in 2005
#2686
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Bennett
Elmira · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan McCormack
Canton · 2017-18
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Thompson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2003-04
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.