IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Judah Makway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 35 2 5 7 0.200 0.0771 0.0804 0.2911 0.3036
2023-24 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 40 5 7 12 0.300 0.1156 0.1153 0.4366 0.4353
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 52 22 17 39 0.750 0.2890 0.2736 1.0915 1.0334
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 33 3 6 9 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2025-26 · Alaska Anchorage
+51.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31669
Forward overall
#1889
Forward born in 2004
#1768
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Hutton
Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Hechter
Saint Anselm · 2001-02
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.