← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Stockfish Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 61 11 20 31 0.508 0.1102 0.1102 0.3932 0.3932
2020-21 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 47 19 31 50 1.064 0.2307 0.2284 0.8231 0.8151
2022-23 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 47 14 18 32 0.681 0.2624 0.2475 0.9909 0.9345
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 38 14 21 35 0.921
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 36 15 12 27 0.750
2023-24 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 32 9 16 25 0.781
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2023-24 · Holy Cross
+280.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20248
Forward overall
#1087
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.