IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Stefanek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 53 10 18 28 0.528 0.2036 0.2112 0.7684 0.7972
2023-24 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 53 17 17 34 0.641 0.2472 0.2451 0.9330 0.9253
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 53 32 31 63 1.189 0.4580 0.4312 1.7288 1.6275
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 26 2 10 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2025-26 · Dartmouth
+51.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14434
Forward overall
#679
Forward born in 2004
#530
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Micale
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cole
Trinity · 2012-13
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.