IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Foley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 26 1 1 2 0.077 0.0217 0.0217 0.0352 0.0352
2019-20 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 27 1 5 6 0.222 0.0627 0.0627 0.1017 0.1017
2021-22 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 20 5 2 7 0.350 0.0987 0.0987 0.1602 0.1602
2022-23 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 48 7 20 27 0.562 0.2095 0.2119 0.8196 0.8289
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC — 35 3 21 24 0.686
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 33 11 19 30 0.909
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 32 5 15 20 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2023-24 · Dartmouth
+297.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11599
Defenseman overall
#2422
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Gluchowski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Sanders
Elmira · 2007-08
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2005-06
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Douglas Elgstam
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.