← New Search ↗ Social Card

Billy Norcross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 33 5 2 7 0.212 0.0420 0.0420 0.0966 0.0966
2019-20 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 34 10 17 27 0.794 0.1573 0.1573 0.3618 0.3618
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 19 2 6 8 0.421 0.1717 0.1717 0.3385 0.3385
2021-22 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 27 11 19 30 1.111 0.2201 0.2201 0.5062 0.5062
2022-23 Penticton Vees BCHL 46 10 15 25 0.543 0.2094 0.2023 0.7910 0.7641
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 22 0 1 1 0.045
2023-24 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast 26 0 4 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · Northeastern
-14.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21189
Forward overall
#1109
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2015-16
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2015-16
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.