← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Bommarito Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 38 2 6 8 0.210 0.0486 0.0507 0.1030 0.1075
2015-16 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Elite 43 26 19 45 1.046 0.0966 0.0953 0.2396 0.2364
2016-17 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 27 26 18 44 1.630 0.1504 0.1397 0.3732 0.3467
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wilkes D1 MAC JR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC 11 1 1 2 0.182
2018-19 Wilkes D1 MAC SO 22 2 5 7 0.318
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC 22 2 5 7 0.318
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC 26 10 9 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2017-18 · Manhattanville
+600.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27499
Forward overall
#1136
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.