| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | New Jersey Jr. Titans | EHL | 38 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.210 | 0.0486 | 0.0507 | 0.1030 | 0.1075 |
| 2015-16 | Portland Jr. Pirates | USPHL-Elite | 43 | 26 | 19 | 45 | 1.046 | 0.0966 | 0.0953 | 0.2396 | 0.2364 |
| 2016-17 | Charlotte Rush | USPHL-Elite | 27 | 26 | 18 | 44 | 1.630 | 0.1504 | 0.1397 | 0.3732 | 0.3467 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Wilkes | D1 | MAC | JR | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.182 |
| 2019-20 | Wilkes | D3 | MAC | — | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.182 |
| 2018-19 | Wilkes | D1 | MAC | SO | 22 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.318 |
| 2018-19 | Wilkes | D3 | MAC | — | 22 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.318 |
| 2017-18 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | — | 26 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 0.731 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.