IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayden Grier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 28 2 2 4 0.143 0.0276 0.0276 0.0654 0.0654
2021-22 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 13 12 25 1.042 0.2009 0.2009 0.4767 0.4767
2022-23 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 31 5 7 12 0.387 0.1491 0.1496 0.5640 0.5657
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 23 4 8 12 0.522
2024-25 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 26 8 4 12 0.462
2023-24 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 21 8 2 10 0.476
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2023-24 · Colby
+227.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33445
Forward overall
#2034
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alec Hagaman
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach White
Curry · 2014-15
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Matthews
Canton · 2016-17
0.941 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.