IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Duncan Ramsay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 5 19 24 0.727 0.2052 0.2052 0.3328 0.3328
2022-23 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 36 2 6 8 0.222 0.0828 0.0837 0.3238 0.3274
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 32 0 2 2 0.062
2024-25 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 32 0 3 3 0.094
2023-24 Vermont D1 HockeyEast — 26 0 1 1 0.038
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2023-24 · Vermont
-69.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12516
Defenseman overall
#2552
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Richard Buri
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Gonrowski
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Fougner
Augsburg · 2000-01
1.167 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brien Thompson
Nichols · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.