icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Tabor | NE-Prep | 28 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.286 | 0.0575 | 0.0575 | 0.1307 | 0.1307 |
| 2021-22 | Tabor | NE-Prep | 20 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 0.950 | 0.1910 | 0.1910 | 0.4344 | 0.4344 |
| 2022-23 | Blackfalds Bulldogs | AJHL | 32 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 0.312 | 0.1048 | 0.1046 | 0.2891 | 0.2886 |
| 2023-24 | Blackfalds Bulldogs | AJHL | 46 | 7 | 26 | 33 | 0.717 | 0.2406 | 0.2289 | 0.6637 | 0.6313 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | JR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2025-26 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | SO | 35 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.257 |
| 2024-25 | Canisius | D1 | AHA | — | 28 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.179 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.