← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isa Parekh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 North York Rangers OJHL 11 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 North York Rangers OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 North York Rangers OJHL 50 7 22 29 0.580 0.1422 0.1476 0.3993 0.4144
2022-23 OJHL 54 13 48 61 1.130 0.2769 0.2732 0.7777 0.7673
2023-24 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 52 5 33 38 0.731 0.2816 0.2666 1.0635 1.0069
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 27 0 2 2 0.074
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA 35 3 15 18 0.514
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.51
2024-25 · Bemidji State
+102.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3910
Defenseman overall
#972
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2012-13
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.