← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Raesler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1659 0.1659 0.4634 0.4634
2020-21 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0829 0.0829 0.2317 0.2317
2021-22 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 31 4 9 13 0.419 0.1392 0.1431 0.3887 0.3997
2022-23 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 57 17 28 45 0.789 0.2620 0.2564 0.7317 0.7162
2023-24 AJHL 44 21 25 46 1.046 0.3469 0.3232 0.9690 0.9027
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SO 27 5 5 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+45.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15171
Forward overall
#739
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2013-14
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.