← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Raesler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1677 0.1677 0.4626 0.4626
2020-21 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0838 0.0838 0.2313 0.2313
2021-22 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 31 4 9 13 0.419 0.1407 0.1447 0.3880 0.3990
2022-23 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 57 17 28 45 0.789 0.2648 0.2592 0.7304 0.7149
2023-24 — AJHL 44 21 25 46 1.046 0.3507 0.3267 0.9673 0.9011
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Lindenwood D1 CCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SO 27 5 5 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2025-26 · Lindenwood
+44.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15917
Forward overall
#791
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2008-09
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2009-10
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.