← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Schumacher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 17 20 37 1.423 0.3831 0.3831 0.3457 0.3457
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0990 0.0990 0.2625 0.2625
2021-22 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 28 7 9 16 0.571 0.2264 0.2475 5.8924 6.2018
2022-23 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 42 14 28 42 1.000 0.3962 0.4137
2023-24 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1229 0.1169 0.5892 0.5602
2024-25 BCHL 48 18 27 45 0.938 0.3492 0.3236 1.3660 1.2658
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 20 8 5 13 0.650
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2025-26 · Mercyhurst
+215.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9174
Forward overall
#369
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.