← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Schumacher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 17 20 37 1.423 0.1802 0.1802 0.3457 0.3457
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 8 1 1 2 0.250 0.0919 0.0919 0.2639 0.2639
2021-22 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 28 7 9 16 0.571 0.2099 0.2295 6.0068 6.3222
2022-23 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 42 14 28 42 1.000 0.3674 0.3836
2023-24 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1122 0.6007 0.5712
2024-25 BCHL 48 18 27 45 0.938 0.3612 0.3347 1.3643 1.2642
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA FR 20 8 5 13 0.650
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2025-26 · Mercyhurst
+209.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9458
Forward overall
#373
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.