← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Plandowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-13 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Blackfalds Bulldogs AJHL 45 9 8 17 0.378 0.1267 0.1355 0.3496 0.3738
2023-24 AJHL 52 12 9 21 0.404 0.1354 0.1384 0.3737 0.3819
2024-25 Calgary Canucks AJHL 50 34 45 79 1.580 0.5299 0.5134 1.4621 1.4165
2025-26 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 54 29 46 75 1.389 0.5351 0.5014 2.0213 1.8939
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7904
Forward overall
#296
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2023-24
0.40
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2021-22
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
AJHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NAHL 2021-22
0.57
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2018-19
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.