IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Sinclair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-10-06 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Burlington Cougars OJHL 1 2 0 2 2.000 0.4902 0.5569 1.3770 1.5643
2024-25 Burlington Cougars OJHL 53 21 40 61 1.151 0.2821 0.3060 0.7924 0.8595
2025-26 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 54 24 36 60 1.111 0.4281 0.4542 1.6170 1.7156
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9976
Forward overall
#223
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Elite
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Connor Levis
WHL 2022-23
0.16
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Ethan Scardina
BCHL 2018-19
0.21
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Austen Swankler
OHL 2019-20
0.72
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Brandon Santa Juana
BCHL 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2010-11
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Bella
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bud Winter
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.