IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reece Gault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-20 Country: Canada
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 52 5 33 38 0.731 0.1407 0.1530 0.4618 0.5023
2025-26 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 8 36 44 0.815 0.3139 0.3310 1.1850 1.2497
2026-27 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4300
Defenseman overall
#644
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Phil Beaulieu
USHL 2014-15
0.42
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Viking Gustafsson Nyberg
SHL-J20 2022-23
0.09
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Rylan Yaremko
BCHL 2015-16
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Josh Zinger
AJHL 2020-21
0.42
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2012-13
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.