IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reece Gault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-08-20 Country: Canada
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 52 5 33 38 0.731 0.1407 0.1530 0.4608 0.5012
2025-26 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 8 36 44 0.815 0.3139 0.3310 1.1858 1.2505
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4229
Defenseman overall
#610
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Phil Beaulieu
USHL 2013-14
0.42
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Luke Gramer
NAHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Viking Gustafsson Nyberg
SHL-J20 2021-22
0.09
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
Hank Sorensen
USHL 2016-17
0.35
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Stevens
Wisconsin-Stout · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.