IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Holland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-17 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Spruce Grove Saints BCHL 39 6 16 22 0.564 0.2173 0.2128 0.8204 0.8035
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Army D1 AHA FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6406
Defenseman overall
#1361
Defenseman born in 2006
#1493
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jude Brower
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
Thomas Quast
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
Lukas McCloskey
WHL 2024-25
0.26
actual FR PPG at Army
Owen Nolan
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Foulds
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Olinyk
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.