← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Quast Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-28 Country: USA
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 20 0 2 2 0.100 0.0127 0.0127 0.0243 0.0243
2022-23 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 25 7 21 28 1.120 0.1418 0.1418 0.2720 0.2720
2023-24 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 26 7 24 31 1.192 0.1509 0.1509
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 54 7 27 34 0.630 0.2313 0.2355 0.6645 0.6765
2025-26 NAHL 57 5 26 31 0.544 0.1998 0.1936 0.5741 0.5562
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4455
Defenseman overall
#1145
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.07
actual FR PPG at Army
AJHL 2017-18
0.14
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2008-09
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.