IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Zona Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-08-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0645 0.1760 0.1854
2019-20 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 47 1 14 15 0.319 0.1172 0.1172 0.3368 0.3368
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 48 0 13 13 0.271 0.0995 0.0995 0.2858 0.2858
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Endicott D3 CNE SR 18 2 10 12 0.667
2024-25 Endicott D3 CNE — 22 3 8 11 0.500
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE — 19 0 5 5 0.263
2021-22 Army D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13213
Defenseman overall
#2253
Defenseman born in 2000
#4402
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Crowley
SUNY Cortland · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Samodral
Chatham · 2021-22
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Spotts
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.