IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Crowley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0409 0.0440 0.1148 0.1235
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 48 8 10 18 0.375 0.1378 0.1446 0.3958 0.4153
2013-14 — NAHL 57 2 12 14 0.246 0.0902 0.0901 0.2592 0.2589
2014-15 — NAHL 59 7 18 25 0.424 0.1557 0.1474 0.4472 0.4233
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Cortland D1 — SR 25 3 13 16 0.640
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 25 3 13 16 0.640
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 25 5 18 23 0.920
2015-16 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 18 2 7 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2015-16 · SUNY Cortland
+369.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38060
Forward overall
#1502
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabriel Flammia
Alvernia · 2024-25
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burnett
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.