IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Crowley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0466 0.0501 0.1150 0.1238
2012-13 Soo Eagles NAHL 48 8 10 18 0.375 0.1392 0.1460 0.3971 0.4166
2013-14 — NAHL 57 2 12 14 0.246 0.0912 0.0911 0.2600 0.2597
2014-15 — NAHL 59 7 18 25 0.424 0.1573 0.1489 0.4486 0.4246
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 — SR 25 3 13 16 0.640
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 — SO 25 5 18 23 0.920
2015-16 SUNY Cortland D3 — FR 18 2 7 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2015-16 · SUNY Cortland
+364.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31053
Forward overall
#1281
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Panvica
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rider McCallum
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.