← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron Spotts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 38 10 10 20 0.526 0.1960 0.2029 0.7669 0.7938
2004-05 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 49 12 13 25 0.510 0.1900 0.1878 0.7434 0.7348
2005-06 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 54 15 22 37 0.685 0.2552 0.2395 0.9984 0.9368
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 St. Scholastica D3 SR 28 10 13 23 0.821
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 JR 22 7 4 11 0.500
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 SO 14 2 0 2 0.143
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 FR 26 3 6 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2006-07 · St. Scholastica
+84.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25051
Forward overall
#789
Forward born in 1985
#1486
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2005-06
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.