IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jude Brower Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brunswick NE-Prep 24 3 0 3 0.125 0.0248 0.0248 0.0570 0.0570
2019-20 Brunswick NE-Prep 30 8 19 27 0.900 0.1783 0.1783 0.4100 0.4100
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 39 5 11 16 0.410 0.1673 0.1673 0.3298 0.3298
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 44 7 18 25 0.568 0.2317 0.2189 0.4567 0.4315
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA SR 34 5 10 15 0.441
2024-25 Army D1 AHA JR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SO 15 0 4 4 0.267
2022-23 Army D1 AHA FR 15 0 1 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2022-23 · Army
-65.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3305
Defenseman overall
#775
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brayden Kolisniak
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
J.D. Speer
Neumann · 2022-23
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Day
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.