IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Nolan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-03-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Millbrook NE-Prep 29 6 14 20 0.690 0.1946 0.1946 0.3156 0.3156
2019-20 Surrey Eagles BCHL 54 4 17 21 0.389 0.1449 0.1449 0.5667 0.5667
2020-21 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 19 1 9 10 0.526 0.2085 0.2085 0.5526 0.5526
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA SR 35 2 5 7 0.200
2024-25 Army D1 AHA JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2022-23 Army D1 AHA FR 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Army
-32.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
92%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7607
Defenseman overall
#1518
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Gustav Olofsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zac Boyle
Neumann · 2014-15
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Kromm
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Rohrer
Neumann · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.