IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coby Mack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Calgary Canucks AJHL 54 8 15 23 0.426 0.1428 0.1419 0.3941 0.3916
2017-18 Calgary Canucks AJHL 16 3 7 10 0.625 0.2096 0.1964 0.5784 0.5421
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Army D1 AHA — 25 2 4 6 0.240
2020-21 Army D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Army D1 AHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Army D1 AHA FR 14 0 2 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2018-19 · Army
-13.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7942
Defenseman overall
#1441
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Gagnon
Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Nelson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Sikich
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.