IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Grinevitch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1980-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 63 47 59 106 1.683 0.5643 0.5172 1.5593 1.4292
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SR 37 6 21 27 0.730
2003-04 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 32 4 12 16 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2003-04 · Alaska Fairbanks
+3.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4408
Forward overall
#137
Forward born in 1980
#16
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Schneider
Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Panchisin
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brody Simko
Trine · 2024-25
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.