IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Houston Bulls NAHL 43 4 5 9 0.209 0.0769 0.0769 0.2209 0.2209
2021-22 Lincoln Stars USHL 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0454 0.0442 0.2310 0.2251
2022-23 Houston Bulls NAHL 59 22 26 48 0.814 0.2989 0.2887 0.8588 0.8296
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 29 5 13 18 0.621
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC — 32 12 14 26 0.812
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC — 22 7 11 18 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2023-24 · Brown
+400.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24878
Forward overall
#1385
Forward born in 2002
#1968
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Mooney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.