IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Croxton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 59 22 31 53 0.898 0.2981 0.3179 0.8325 0.8879
2001-02 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 62 38 48 86 1.387 0.4602 0.4523 1.2856 1.2636
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 RPI D1 — SR 31 14 25 39 1.258
2004-05 RPI D1 — JR 38 10 25 35 0.921
2003-04 RPI D1 — SO 39 18 21 39 1.000
2002-03 RPI D1 — FR 39 15 15 30 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2002-03 · RPI
+125.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9113
Forward overall
#307
Forward born in 1982
#109
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Frank DiChiara
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Clarke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2007-08
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Bostrom
Bethel · 2003-04
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.