IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curtis Glencross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-12-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 23 22 45 0.750 0.2515 0.2682 0.6951 0.7414
2001-02 Brooks Bandits AJHL 53 42 26 68 1.283 0.4303 0.4458 1.1891 1.2320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 37 21 13 34 0.919
2002-03 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 35 11 12 23 0.657
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.66
2002-03 · Alaska Anchorage
+104.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11464
Forward overall
#398
Forward born in 1982
#160
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luke Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Roos
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2015-16
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2015-16
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jaden Davis
Aurora · 2022-23
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.