IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelly Czuy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-01-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Bow Valley Eagles AJHL 56 17 19 36 0.643 0.2156 0.2300 0.5958 0.6355
2001-02 Canmore Eagles AJHL 64 35 34 69 1.078 0.3616 0.3611 0.9992 0.9980
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SR 36 7 11 18 0.500
2004-05 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 37 10 17 27 0.730
2003-04 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 36 13 16 29 0.806
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2003-04 · Alaska Fairbanks
+204.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15862
Forward overall
#522
Forward born in 1983
#312
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Bourdow
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.