← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kris Kasper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-10-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Fort Saskatchewan Traders AJHL 8 0 0 0 0.000
2001-02 AJHL 51 18 24 42 0.824 0.2762 0.2865 0.7621 0.7905
2002-03 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 33 14 13 27 0.818 0.2096 0.2104 0.6168 0.6192
2003-04 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 30 13 14 27 0.900 0.3019 0.2831 0.8329 0.7811
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 13 18 0.529
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 13 18 0.529
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 13 18 0.529
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 13 18 0.529
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 13 18 0.529
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 13 18 0.529
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2020-21 · Ohio University
+143.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14683
Forward overall
#498
Forward born in 1983
#245
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2002-03
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2009-10
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.