IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian McNary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 St. Albert Saints AJHL 58 9 23 32 0.552 0.1850 0.2107 0.5105 0.5815
2003-04 St. Albert Saints AJHL 60 24 49 73 1.217 0.4081 0.4361 1.1259 1.2032
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Brown D1 ECAC JR 30 6 18 24 0.800
2005-06 Brown D1 ECAC SO 30 5 18 23 0.767
2004-05 Brown D1 ECAC FR 33 8 10 18 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2004-05 · Brown
+84.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15061
Forward overall
#521
Forward born in 1986
#263
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Weis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sean Malone
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gabe Guertler
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Frederik Tiffels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.