← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Shirey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-06 Country: USA
Aurora
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — NAHL 34 2 6 8 0.235 0.0864 0.0942 — —
2023-24 — NAHL 57 6 13 19 0.333 0.1225 0.1277 0.3523 0.3673
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 28 1 4 5 0.179 0.1054 0.0997 0.5359 0.5069
2025-26 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 46 4 7 11 0.239 0.0921 0.0862 0.3477 0.3255
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16431
Defenseman overall
#3033
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Aurora Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.56
actual FR PPG at Aurora
0.50
actual FR PPG at Aurora
0.63
actual FR PPG at Aurora
0.68
actual FR PPG at Aurora

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.