IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Glasser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-11 Country: Canada
2005 · Round 7, Pick #220  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 55 13 12 25 0.455 0.1524 0.1709 0.4206 0.4716
2004-05 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 62 25 24 49 0.790 0.2651 0.2846 0.7313 0.7851
2005-06 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 58 15 20 35 0.603 0.2024 0.2077 0.5584 0.5730
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Denver D1 NCHC SR 41 3 3 6 0.146
2008-09 Denver D1 NCHC JR 40 4 3 7 0.175
2007-08 Denver D1 NCHC SO 40 6 2 8 0.200
2006-07 Denver D1 NCHC FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#27153
Forward overall
#871
Forward born in 1987
#799
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Redmon
Augsburg · 2016-17
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Robert Holyoke
Assumption · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Tatro
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.