IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Gibson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-02-14 Country: Canada
2011 · Round 2, Pick #39  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Calgary Royals AJHL 53 4 10 14 0.264 0.0886 0.0891 0.2445 0.2458
2004-05 Calgary Royals AJHL 59 10 24 34 0.576 0.1933 0.1851 0.5333 0.5107
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 16 2 2 4 0.250
2006-07 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 28 0 5 5 0.179
2005-06 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 26 2 1 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2005-06 · Dartmouth
-16.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10999
Defenseman overall
#1167
Defenseman born in 1985
#1334
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Samuel Lozinski
Albertus Magnus · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bagnole
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Faulkner
Hobart · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.