← New Search ↗ Social Card

Barrett Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-29 Country: USA
2022 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #164  ·  Seattle Kraken Seattle Kraken
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 26 24 31 55 2.115 0.5695 0.5695 0.5138 0.5138
2020-21 Gentry Academy USHS-MN 19 23 14 37 1.947 0.5242 0.5242 0.4730 0.4730
2021-22 NAHL 19 5 15 20 1.053 0.4170 0.4486 1.1051 1.1890
2022-23 USHL 56 17 28 45 0.804 0.4940 0.4857 2.3676 2.3277
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 36 10 18 28 0.778
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 34 7 15 22 0.647
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 33 8 8 16 0.485
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
+20.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

95%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5673
Forward overall
#180
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.82 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.